ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC.

v.

MONK ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (34 total)

• Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper, 447 U.S. 752 (U.S. 1980)
  …phasis in original). In contrast, § 1927 deals only with attorney conduct and involves taxing costs against counsel. The Court of Appeals vacated the District Court’s order and remanded for recalculation of costs under § 1927. We granted certiorari, 444 U. S. 1012 (1980). II This case involves the problem of what sanctions may be imposed on lawyers who unreasonably extend court proceedings.4 Two specific provisions have been said to be controlling in this case: 28 U. S. C. § 1927, and Federal Rule of Civil…
• United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …to the jury concerning media coverage and its collective questioning of the jury were adequate safeguards to ensure that appellants received a fair trial free from prejudice. United States v. Capo, 595 F. 2d 1086, 1093 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1012, 100 S.Ct. 660, 62 L.Ed.2d 641 (1980); United States v. Herring, 568 F. 2d 1099 (5th Cir. 1978).22 An individual, rather than a collective, voir dire concerning the jurors’ exposure to publicity occurring during the trial is not required in all cas…
• United States v. Augustin Alvarez, 755 F.2d 830 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …ance with due process standards established in Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 81 S.Ct. 1639, 6 L.Ed.2d 751 (1961). See United States v. Gorel, 622 F. 2d 100, 103 (5th Cir.1979); United States v. Capo, 595 F. 2d 1086, 1090 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1012, 100 S.Ct. 660, 62 L.Ed.2d 641 (1980). Mere juror exposure to news accounts concerning the crimes with which the appellants were charged does not create an automatic presumption of a denial of due process. Gorel, 622 F. 2d at 103. Rather, the appell…