RUNCK

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (28 total)

• Coal. FOR Adequacy & Fairness IN Sch. Funding, Inc. v. Lawton Chiles, 680 So. 2d 400 (Fla. 1996)
  …A. 2d 1375 (1993); Pauley v. Kelly, 162 W.Va. 672, 255 S.E. 2d 859 (1979). In contrast, in Ohio, the court upheld the constitutionality of its school system. Board of Educ. v. Walter, 58 Ohio St.2d 368, 390 N.E. 2d [*405] 813 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015, 100 S.Ct. 665, 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980). In so doing, the Supreme Court of Ohio found that the rational basis standard applied because "the case is more directly connected with the way in which Ohio has decided to collect and spend state and local tax…
• Donovan v. Dewey, 452 U.S. 594 (U.S. 1981)
  …t an order accommodating any unusual privacy interests that the mineowner might have. See, e. g., Marshall v. Stoudt’s Ferry Preparation Co., 602 F. 2d 589, 594 (CA3 1979) (inspectors ordered to keep confidential mine's trade secrets), cert. denied, 444 U. S. 1015 (1980). Under these circumstances, it is difficult to see what additional protection a warrant requirement would provide. The Act itself clearly notifies the operator that inspections will be performed on a regular basis. Moreover, the Act and the…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Latroy D. RAY, 828 F.2d 399 (7th Cir. 1987)
  …accepting that agreement, a main purpose of Rule 11(e)(3) was met. See United States v. Runck, 601 F. 2d 968, 969-70 (8th Cir.1979) (during sentencing judge added condition of restitution, a term outside the bounds of plea agreement), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015, 100 S.Ct. 665, 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980). Any failure to inform McChristion that the terms of the agreement would be embodied in the disposition did not affect McChristion’s decision to plead guilty or the fairness of now holding him to that plea, an…