CHODOS

v.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Citator

Cited By

• Ursic v. Bethlehem Mines, 719 F.2d 670 (3d Cir. 1983)
  …2d 411 (3d Cir. 1979); Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs v. United States Steel Corp., 606 F. 2d 53 (3d Cir. 1979); Dunn v. H.K. Porter Co., 602 F. 2d 1105 (3d Cir. 1979); Francois v. Francois, 599 F. 2d 1286 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1021, 100 S.Ct. 679, 62 L.Ed.2d 653 (1979); Prandini v. National Tea Co., 585 F. 2d 47 (3d Cir.1978); Baughman v. Wilson Freight Forwarding Co., 583 F. 2d 1208 (3d Cir.1978); Hughes v. Repko, 578 F. 2d 483 (3d Cir.1978); Shlensky v. Dorsey, 574 F. 2d 131…
• United States v. Hendricks, 661 F.2d 38 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …hese time limitations since it occurred less than two months from his first appearance before a judicial officer of the Northern District of Texas, Amarillo Division. See United States v. Umbower, 602 F. 2d 754, 758-59 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1021, 100 S.Ct. 678, 62 L.Ed.2d 652 (1980).6 Finding no statutory violation of appellant’s speedy trial rights we now turn to his Sixth Amendment claim, which raises a related, but different, guarantee. See United States v. Edwards, 577 F. 2d 883, 887 n…
• Lenza v. Wyrick, 665 F.2d 804 (8th Cir. 1981)
  …of Appeals. State v. Lenza, 582 S.W. 2d 703 (Mo. App.1979). Subsequent motions for transfer to the Missouri Supreme Court were denied. Lenza’s petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Supreme Court was also denied. Lenza v. Missouri, 444 U.S. 1021, 100 S.Ct. 678, 62 L.Ed.2d 652 (1980). In this appeal Lenza argues that the district court erred in (1) finding that he had been given an opportunity for full and fair consideration of his fourth amendment claim by the state, (2) finding that he ha…