FUNGAROLI

v.

FUNGAROLI

Citator

Cited By (43 total)

• Shaw v. DELTA AIR Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (U.S. 1983)
  …in Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., 451 U. S. 504 (1981), and on its own ruling in Pervel Industries, Inc. v. Connecticut Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 603 F. 2d 214 (1979), order aff’g 468 F. Supp. 490 (Conn. 1978), cert. denied, 444 U. S. 1031 (1980), the court held that § 514(a) of ERISA operated to pre-empt the Hulmán Rights Law, and that § 514(d) did not save that law from ¡preemption.11 With respect to the Disability Benefits Law, the Court of Appeals had concluded earlier that § 4(b)…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Gomez v. Toledo, 446 U.S. 635 (U.S. 1980)
  …bsence of any such allegation, it held, required dismissal of [*638] the complaint. The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed. 602 F. 2d 1018 (1979).4 We granted certiorari to resolve a conflict among the Courts of Appeals.5 444 U. S. 1031 (1980). We now reverse. II Section 1983 provides a cause of action for “the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws” by any person acting “under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom,…
• Cal. Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. v. Guerra, 479 U.S. 272 (U.S. 1987)
  …title VIL’ ” Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., supra, at 103, n. 24 (quoting Pervel Industries, Inc. v. Connecticut Comm’n on Human Rights and Opportunities, 468 F. Supp. 490, 493 (Conn. 1978), affirmance order, 603 F. 2d 214 (CA2 1979), cert. denied, 444 U. S. 1031 (1980)). Similarly, § 1104 was intended primarily to “assert the intention of Congress to preserve existing civil rights laws.” 110 Cong. Rec. 2788 (1964) (remarks of Rep. Meader). See also H. R. Rep. No. 914, 88th Cong., 1st Sess., 59 (1963) (addit…