DUNGAN

v.

KENTUCKY BAR ASSN.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Shelton, 669 F.2d 446 (7th Cir. 1982)
  …es difficult. A mailing is in furtherance of a scheme to defraud if it is designed to lull an investor into a sense of security after he has already paid for his investment. United States v. Toney, 598 F. 2d 1349, 1353 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1033, 100 S.Ct. 706, 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980). See also United States v. Sampson, 371 U.S. 75, 81, 83 S.Ct. 173, 176, 9 L.Ed.2d 136 (1962); United States v. Habel, 613 F. 2d 1321, 1325 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925, 100 S.Ct. 3018, 65 L.Ed.2d 111…
• United States v. Rodgers, 624 F.2d 1303 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …cheme or Schemes Relying upon the applicability of conspiracy law principles to mail fraud prosecutions, see United States v. Freeman, 619 F. 2d 1112, 1123 (5th Cir. 1980); United States v. Toney, 598 F. 2d 1349, 1355 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1033, 100 S.Ct. 706, 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980); United States v. Krohn, 573 F. 2d 1382, 1386 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 949, 98 S.Ct. 2857, 56 L.Ed.2d 792 (1978); United States v. AMREP Corp., 560 F. 2d 539, 545 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S…
• United States v. Dadanian, 818 F.2d 1443 (9th Cir. 1987)
  …cipant in a fraudulent scheme causes a use of the mails in execution of the fraud, all other knowing participants in the scheme are legally liable for that use of the mails.” United States v. Toney, 598 F. 2d 1349, 1355 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1033, 100 S.Ct. 706, 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980). In viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, a jury could reasonably find that the Danadians could have foreseen that Pitts, as Bell City Administrator, would file statements of econo…