TREASURE ISLE, INC.

v.

CARR, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Citator

Cited By (33 total)

• United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …ipant in a fraudulent scheme causes a use of the mails in execution of the fraud, all other knowing participants in the scheme are legally liable for that use of the mails.” United States v. Toney, 598 F. 2d 1349, 1355 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1033, 100 S.Ct. 706, 62 L.Ed. 670 (1980). The evidence shows that Morgado was involved with several other defendants in the scheme to defraud the insurer through the arson of the Vasconia Street property. The mail fraud convictions are supported by the…
• United States v. Read, 658 F.2d 1225 (7th Cir. 1981)
  …enth Circuit, 1980) [West], Nevertheless, this Circuit does not impose a per se rule; we review all the instructions and the facts and circumstances of the case. United States v. Johnson, 605 F. 2d 1025, 1028 (7th Cir. 1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1033, 100 S.Ct. 706, 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980). Our review of the evidence and the instructions convinces us that the failure to instruct here was reversible error. The statute of limitations ran on April 24, 1974, five years before the return date of the in…
• United States v. Hewes, 729 F.2d 1302 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …: (1) The accused participated in a scheme or artifice to defraud; (2) The defendant “caused” a use of the mails; (3) The mailing was for the purpose of executing the scheme. United States v. Toney, 598 F. 2d 1349, 1351 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1033, 100 S.Ct. 706, 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980). The appellants claim that the evidence did not [*1321] show that the Rekeus letters were for the purpose of executing the fraudulent scheme. The government responds that the merger and letters announcing it wer…