MOLDOVAN

v.

ALLIS CHALMERS MANUFACTURING CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (52 total)

• Luce v. United States, 469 U.S. 38 (U.S. 1984)
  …unequivocally announcing his intention to testify if his motion to exclude prior convictions is granted, and if he proffers the substance of his contemplated testimony. See United States v. Cook, 608 F. 2d 1175, 1186 (1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 444 U. S. 1034 (1980). Although the Federal Rules of Evidence do not explicitly authorize in limine rulings, the practice has developed pursuant to the district court’s inherent authority to manage the course of trials. See generally Fed. Rule Evid. 103(e); cf. F…
• United States v. Mohammad Reza Mehrmanesh, 689 F.2d 822 (9th Cir. 1982)
  …oneously held the 1975 hashish conviction admissible for impeachment purposes under Fed.R.Evid. 609, thus preventing him from testifying and denying him a fair trial. See United States v. Cook, 608 F. 2d 1175 (9th Cir. 1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034, 100 S.Ct. 706, 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980). Although we conclude the court committed error in this regard, in light of our Rule 404(b) discussion we find the error harmless. See note 10 supra. The Government argues that Mehrmanesh’s 1975 smuggling convi…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Brantley, 733 F.2d 1429 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …. Reyes, 645 F. 2d 285, 288 (5th Cir.1981); United States v. Buchanan, 633 F. 2d 423, 427 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912, 101 S.Ct. 1984, 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981); United States v. Martinez, 604 F. 2d 361, 364 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034, 100 S.Ct. 708, 62 L.Ed.2d 671 (1980)). Significantly, in all these cases, except for Sedigh, which is distinguished above, the trial court questioned every juror about the possible jury misconduct or outside influence at issue. . 14 U.S.C.A. § 8…