UNITED STATES
v.
CALIFORNIA

U.S. | 1980-01-21
No. 5
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this order.
444 U.S. 1042 Supreme Court of the United States (1980) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …d Transport, Inc.), 231 N. L. R. B. 351 (1977). A divided panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit declined to enforce the Board’s orders. 198 U. S. App. D. C. 157, 613 F. 2d 890 (1979). We granted certiorari, 444 U. S. 1042 (1980), to resolve a conflict among the Circuits on this important question of federal labor law.1 I This controversy arises out of the collective-bargaining response of the ILA and the east coast shipping industry to [*494] containerization, a te…
  • …zed means.” International Longshoremen’s Ass’n v. NLRB, 613 F. 2d 890, 914 (D.C.Cir.1979). Because of the conflict among the circuits, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to help resolve the difficult legal problems containerization had engendered. 444 U.S. 1042, 100 S.Ct. 727, 62 L.Ed.2d 728 (1980). B. In NLRB v. International Longshoremen’s Ass’n, 447 U.S. 490, 100 S.Ct. 2305, 65 L.Ed.2d 289 (1980), a sharply divided Supreme Court affirmed the District of Columbia Circuit, holding that the Board’s defin…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw