CUYLER, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, ET AL.

v.

ADAMS

Citator

Cited By

• Harris v. McRAE, 448 U.S. 297 (U.S. 1980)
  …all authorized providers of abortions for such women:10 The Secretary then applied to this Court for a stay of the judgment pending direct appeal of the District Court’s decision. We denied the stay, but noted probable jurisdiction of this appeal. 444 U. S. 1069. II It is well settled that if a case may be decided on either statutory or constitutional grounds, this Court, for sound [*307] jurisprudential reasons, will inquire first into the statutory question. This practice reflects the deeply rooted doct…
• United States R.R. Ret. Bd. v. Fritz, 449 U.S. 166 (U.S. 1980)
  …tional a section of the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974, 88 Stat. 1305, as amended, 45 U. S. C. § 231 et seq., and the United States Railroad Retirement Board has appealed to this Court pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 1252. We noted probable jurisdiction. 444 U. S. 1069 (1980). The 1974 Act fundamentally restructured the railroad retirement system. The Act’s predecessor statute, adopted in 1937, provided a system of retirement and disability benefits for persons who pursued careers in the railroad industry. Under…
• Env't Prot. Agency v. Nat'l Crushed Stone Ass'n, 449 U.S. 64 (U.S. 1980)
  …er Co. v. Train, 545 F. 2d 1351, 1378 (CA4 1976). We granted certiorari to resolve the conflict between the decisions below and Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Costle, 191 U. S. App. D. C. 309, 590 F. 2d 1011 (1978), in which the variance provision was upheld. 444 U. S. 1069. I We shall first briefly outline the basic structure of the Act, which translates Congress’ broad goal of eliminating “the discharge of pollutants into the navigable waters,” 33 U. S. C. §1251 (a)(1), into specific requirements that must be met b…