HONICKER

v.

HENDRIE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (40 total)

• Eller & Co., Inc. v. Galapagos Line, S.A., 493 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
  …is well settled that clauses in contracts limiting liability are valid and enforceable provided the intention to limit liability is made clear in the contract. See Elgie & Company v. S.S. “S.A. Nederburg” 599 F. 2d 1177 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1072, 100 S.Ct. 1016, 62 L.Ed.2d 753 (1980); Insurance Company of North America v. Avis Rent-a-Car System, Inc., 348 So. 2d 1149 (Fla.1977); Middleton v. Lomaskin, 266 So. 2d 678 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972). Since the agreement in the instant case specifically p…
• State v. Schrager, 472 So. 2d 896 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)
  …, that the evidence before the magistrate must explain the method by which the executing agents are to differentiate the contraband from the rest of defendant’s inventory. United States v. Cortellesso, 601 F. 2d 28, 31 (1st Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1072, 100 S.Ct. 1016, 62 L.Ed.2d 753 (1980). See also United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F. 2d 1343 (11th Cir.1982). The Cortellesso court went on to point out that “warrants are to be tested ‘in a common-sense and realistic fashion’_” 601 F. 2d at 32. It i…
• United States v. Milan Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42 (2d Cir. 1983)
  …since Congress enumerated acts “with no restrictions limiting [RICO] to persons with particular affiliations”); United States v. Vignola, 464 F.Supp. 1091, 1095-97 (E.D.Pa.) (same), aff’d without opinion, 605 F. 2d 1199 (3d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1072, 100 S.Ct. 1015, 62 L.Ed.2d 753 (1980); cf. United States v. Roselli, 432 F. 2d 879, 885-86 (9th Cir.1970) (rejecting contention that “business enterprise,” 18 U.S.C. § 1952, reaches only “businesses] ... associated with or controlled by a clandesti…