STUYVESANT INSURANCE CO.

v.

MASSACHUSETTS

Citator

Cited By

• Am. Fed'n of Gov't Emps. v. Joella DeGRIO, 454 So. 2d 632 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
  …ound that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. After oral argument, this court dismissed the petition for prohibition without opinion. Mudgett v. Gale, 366 So. 2d 901 (Fla.3d DCA), cert. denied, 376 So. 2d 74 (Fla.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1080, 100 S.Ct. 1032, 62 L.Ed.2d 764 (1980). Following the prohibition proceedings, the trial court struck the punitive damages claim in the complaint. A nonjury trial was conducted on September 22-23, and December 11, 1981. The court found for DeGrio o…
• United States v. Wagner, 834 F.2d 1474 (9th Cir. 1987)
  …has also observed that “ ‘[a]n improper instruction rarely justifies a finding of plain error.’ ” United States v. Bustillo, 789 F. 2d 1364, 1367-68 (9th Cir.1986) (quoting United States v. Glickman, 604 F. 2d 625, 632 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1080, 100 S.Ct. 1032, 62 L.Ed.2d 764 (1980)). We do not believe that an “obvious injustice” has been perpetrated in this case. The government presented eye witnesses who testified that Wagner pulled a knife, chased, and stabbed an unarmed man in the hea…
• United States v. Clement Kolodziej, 706 F.2d 590 (5th Cir. 1983)
  …s v. Napier, 5 Cir.1971, 451 F. 2d 552, 553. This burden can usually be met by showing that the informant placed the telephone call knowing that it would be monitored. United States v. Glickman, 9 Cir.1979, 604 F. 2d 625, 633-34, cert. denied, 1980, 444 U.S. 1080, 100 S.Ct. 1032, 62 L.Ed.2d 764; United States v. Bonanno, 2 Cir.1973, 487 F. 2d 654, 658. When, however, there is an allegation of coercion, the government must show that there has been no undue pressure, threats, or improper inducements. See Unite…