GLEASON

v.

UNITED STATES; AND LUFTIG V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (51 total)

• United States v. Lewis, 759 F.2d 1316 (8th Cir. 1985)
  …determine when the objectives have been attained and when the conspiracy has ended. Under similar circumstances, other courts have admitted statements from the concealment phase. United States v. Gleason, 616 F. 2d 2, 23 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1082, 100 S.Ct. 1037, 62 L.Ed.2d 767 (1980) (statement made to allay suspicion of investigator admitted as being in furtherance of conspiracy); United States v. Del Valle, 587 F. 2d 699, 703-04 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 909, 99 S.Ct. 2822, 61 L.…
• United States v. Milan Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42 (2d Cir. 1983)
  …sufficient to establish his relationship in the conspiracy. You must find ... actual knowing participation of [the] defendant [under consideration] in the agreement .... ” See United States v. Gleason, 616 F. 2d 2, 16-17 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1082, 100 S.Ct. 1037, 62 L.Ed.2d 767 (1980).18 [*64] We turn to an examination of the claims raised by individual appellants. Bagaric Bagaric advances two contentions. Initially, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. Viewing the evidence most…
• United States v. Gironda, 758 F.2d 1201 (7th Cir. 1985)
  …ful project, and could be reasonably foreseen as a necessary or natural consequence of the unlawful agreement." United States v. Sampol, 636 F. 2d 621, 676 (D.C.Cir.1980). Accord United States v. Gleason, 616 F. 2d 2, 20 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1082, 100 S.Ct. 1037, 62 L.Ed.2d 767 (1980). . This court realizes that the Pinkerton doctrine has engendered criticism from various commentators. See, e.g., W. LaFave & A. Scott, Criminal Law 514 (1972). Despite this criticism, the Pinkerton doctrine h…