WALKER

v.

ESTELLE, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Greene v. United States, 880 F.2d 1299 (11th Cir. 1989)
  …t petitioner voluntarily waived his right to an attorney. Additional factors that support a finding of volun-tariness include petitioner’s dismissal of two court-appointed attorneys, see Taylor v. Hopper, 596 F. 2d 1284 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1083, 100 S.Ct. 1039, 62 L.Ed.2d 768 (1980), and his clear indication at the change of plea proceeding that he wanted to represent himself. See Fitzpatrick v. Wainwright, 800 F. 2d 1057, 1064 (11th Cir.1986). . In a Notice of Superseding Indictment file…
• In re United States v. Kember, 648 F.2d 1354 (D.C. Cir. 1980)
  …me of the United States. ... The [Court Reform] Act did not vitiate the essential character of the District of Columbia as an arm of the sovereign United States.” Goode v. Markley, 603 F. 2d 973, 976 (D.C.Cir.1979) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1083, 100 S.Ct. 1039, 62 L.Ed.2d 768 (1980). As appellants acknowledge, Joint Brief for Appellants at 9, the Court Reform Act was intended to lessen the U. S. District Court caseload burden. “A central purpose and policy of the D. C. court reorganizatio…
• Foster v. Ripley, 645 F.2d 1142 (D.C. Cir. 1981)
  …This is a strained reading of the handbook, which states nothing about dismissal for cause, particularly when set against the express language of Smithsonian Memorandum 712. Cf. Florentino v. United States, 607 F. 2d 963 (Ct.Cl.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1083, 100 S.Ct. 1039, 62 L.Ed.2d 768 (1980) (government manual provisions did not furnish an objective entitlement due to conflict with federal regulations). In any event, we affirm on this issue because we believe that Foster received all the process t…