SHAPIRO ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …leases. This testimony was plainly admissible, as an inconsistent statement of a declarant, to impeach Spina’s credibility under Federal Rule of Evidence 806.10 See United States v. Lawson, 608 F. 2d 1129, 1130 (6th Cir. 1979), cert. [*1358] denied, 444 U.S. 1091, 100 S.Ct. 1056, 62 L.Ed.2d 779 (1980). Appellant argues, however, that it would be unfair to apply Rule 806 to this case because the admission of the initial hearsay statement was based on Spina’s unavailability, and this unavailability was due to…
• United States v. Voice, 627 F.2d 138 (8th Cir. 1980)
  …on by the accused identifying himself as the person involved in the [crime] is sufficient to sustain a guilty verdict when the crime itself is shown by independent evidence.” United States v. Opdahl, 610 F. 2d 490, 494 (8th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1091, 100 S.Ct. 1056, 62 L.Ed.2d 780 (1980). Moreover, we conclude that defendant’s confession to his brother-in-law Quinton McGhee bore substantial indicia of reliability in that it described details not brought up by police interrogators. Specifically,…
• Lufkins v. Leapley, 965 F.2d 1477 (8th Cir. 1992)
  …borative evidence of the accused’s identity need not be shown in cases where the state has established injury to person or property caused by the criminal acts of some person. United States v. Opdahl, 610 F. 2d 490, 493 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1091, 100 S.Ct. 1056, 62 L.Ed.2d 780 (1980). The South Dakota Supreme Court has also adopted this position. South Dakota defines the corpus delicti as (1) the fact of an injury or loss, and (2) the fact of someone’s criminal responsibility for the injury…