RUFFIN

v.

GEORGIA; FERNOS-LOPEZ V. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO ET AL.; GENINS V. GEIGER ET UX.; MOENCKMEIER V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; LAMPKIN-ASAM V. SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA; VISLISEL V. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ET AL.; HUNT ET AL. V. COASTAL STATES GAS PRODUCING CO. ET AL.; HEYNE V. HEYNE ET AL.; ASH ET UX. V. TRUSTEES FOR WESTGATE-CALIFORNIA CORP.

Citator

Cited By

• Ivon Ray Stanley v. Zant, 697 F.2d 955 (11th Cir. 1983)
  …f his sixth and fourteenth amendment rights. His petition was denied on July 26, 1979. Certificate of probable cause for appeal to the Georgia Supreme Court and petition for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court were denied. Stanley v. Zant, 444 U.S. 1103, 100 S.Ct. 1068, 62 L.Ed.2d 788 (1980). He filed a second state habeas petition in superior court but, with one exception, the court held that the petition presented grounds which could have been presented earlier and were therefore waived. The stat…
• Thomas v. Zant, 697 F.2d 977 (11th Cir. 1983)
  …d have been willing to appear during the punishment stage of the trial.1 The court denied relief and denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal to the Supreme Court of Georgia. The United States Supreme Court denied certiorari. Thomas v. Zant, 444 U.S. 1103, 100 S.Ct. 1068, 62 L.Ed.2d 788 (1980). Thomas filed a second state habeas corpus petition, alleging that counsel representing him at the earlier state habeas hearing had been ineffective. Following denial without hearing of this second petition, T…
• Alderman v. Zant, 22 F.3d 1541 (11th Cir. 1994)
  …or argument. Relief was denied. The Supreme Court of Georgia subsequently denied Alderman a certificate of probable cause to appeal. The Supreme Court of the United States denied Alderman’s petition for a writ of certiorari. Alderman v. Balkcom, 444 U.S. 1103, 100 S.Ct. 1068, 62 L.Ed.2d 788, reh’g denied, 445 U.S. 973, 100 S.Ct. 1670, 64 L.Ed.2d 252 (1980). Alderman then filed an application for federal habeas corpus relief in federal district court. The district court ruled on two issues and granted r…