H. L.

v.

MATHESON, GOVERNOR OF UTAH, ET. AL.

Citator

Cited By (34 total)

• Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal., 449 U.S. 232 (U.S. 1980)
  …0 (c) of the APA, 5 U. S. C. § 704. We granted the Commission’s petition for a writ of cer-tiorari because of the importance of the questions raised by Socal’s request for judicial review of the complaint before the conclusion of the adjudication. 445 U. S. 903 (1980). We now reverse. II The Commission averred in its complaint that it had reason to believe that Socal was violating the Act. That averment is subject to judicial review before the conclusion of administrative adjudication only if the issuanc…
• Williams v. United States, 458 U.S. 279 (U.S. 1982)
  …ted this contention, however, concluding that petitioner’s actions “constitute classic incidents of check kiting.” 639 F. 2d 1311, 1319 (CA5 1981). In line with its earlier decision in United States v. Payne, 602 F. 2d 1215 (CA5 1979), cert. denied, 445 U. S. 903 (1980), the court found such action proscribed by the statute. We granted certiorari, limited to Questions 3 and 4 presented by the petition, in order to resolve a conflict concerning the reach of § 1014.5 454 U. S. 1030 and 1096 (1981). II To ob…
• United States v. West, 670 F.2d 675 (7th Cir. 1982)
  …h. denied, 418 U.S. 955, 94 S.Ct. 3234, 41 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1974). It is beyond question that invited response is a proper subject of closing argument. Id. at 1165. See also United States v. Falk, 605 F. 2d 1005, 1013 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 903, 100 S.Ct. 1079, 63 L.Ed.2d 319 (1980). Appellants cite to numerous specific comments during the Government’s argument as improper. We have reviewed the trial transcript, including the witness testimony and all the attorneys’ arguments, and are con…