WHITMAN, SHERIFF

v.

FORD

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Indus. Inv. Dev. Corp. v. Mitsui & Co., Ltd., 671 F.2d 876 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …udge: This is an antitrust suit. The district court initially granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the single ground that the action was barred by the act of state doctrine. We reversed. 594 F. 2d 48 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 903, 100 S.Ct. 1078, 63 L.Ed.2d 318 (1980). On remand, the district court turned back to the same motion of the defendants and granted summary judgment on the three remaining grounds: (1) that defendants’ conduct is beyond the extra-territorial scope of…
• United States v. Howard, 774 F.2d 838 (7th Cir. 1985)
  …to determine the probable effect of the improper argument. It may well in some case result in a reversal which could have been avoided by adherence to proper standards.” United States v. Falk, 605 F. 2d 1005, 1013 n. 13 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 903, 100 S.Ct. 1079, 63 L.Ed.2d 319 (1980). See United States v. Carter, 720 F. 2d 951 n. 10; United States v. Allain, 671 F. 2d at 254; United States v. Spain, 536 F. 2d 170, 176 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 833, 97 S.Ct. 96, 50 L.Ed.2d 97 (197…
• United States v. Scott, 660 F.2d 1145 (7th Cir. 1981)
  …tive juror from service, it is patently improper to make an appeal to that interest in closing argument. United States v. Trutenko, 490 F. 2d 678, 679 (7th Cir. 1973).48 See United States v. Falk, 605 F. 2d 1005, 1012 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 903, 100 S.Ct. 1079, 63 L.Ed.2d 319 (1980). Here, Scott’s attorney was appealing to the pecuniary interest of the taxpayer.49 Such an appeal cannot be tolerated from the defense any more than it can be allowed by the government. In this instance, the de…

  ← 1 / 2 →