DAYTON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (93 total)

• United States v. Johnson, 481 U.S. 681 (U.S. 1987)
  …laim against FAA air traffic controllers); Woodside v. United States, 606 F. 2d 134 (CA6 1979) [*688] (Air Force officer killed in plane crash allegedly due to negligence of civilian flight instructor employed by military flight club), cert. denied, 445 U. S. 904 (1980); Uptegrove v. United States, 600 F. 2d 1248 (CA9 1979) (see n. 3, supra), cert. denied, 444 U. S. 1044 (1980); Watkins v. United States, 462 F. Supp. 980 (SD Ga. 1977) (serviceman killed on base when motorcycle collided with shuttle bus drive…
• United States v. Adams, 634 F.2d 830 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …rescribes in addition a number of specific statements to be made to the defendant and questions to be asked of him. Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(c), (d) and (f). Only recently, in United States v. Dayton, 604 F. 2d 931 (5th Cir. 1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 904, 100 S.Ct. 1080, 63 L.Ed.2d 320 (1980), we considered the applicability of McCarthy to this much expanded form of Rule 11. We determined that only a neglect of one of the Rule’s core concerns (i. e., lack of coercion, comprehension of the charge, an…
• United States v. Henry, 709 F.2d 298 (5th Cir. 1983)
  …. No one thought the Court’s only recourse was to amend the Rule itself. Similarly, our own court has participated in the continuing development of the law under Rule 11. United States v. Dayton, 604 F. 2d 931 (5th Cir.1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 904, 100 S.Ct. 1080, 63 L.Ed.2d 320 (1980). After we did so, sitting en banc, the Rule’s meaning in our Circuit has not been as it was. We would therefore conclude that whatever the state of pre-1946 law, Rule 35 was not intended to etch it in stone,…