MIROFF ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (63 total)

• Gahley v. State, 567 So. 2d 456 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
  …rge is a supplemental instruction generally given when it appears the jury is having difficulty reaching a verdict. United States v. Nickell, 883 F. 2d 824 (9th Cir.1989); United States v. Blevinal, 607 F. 2d 1124, 1126 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 928, 100 S.Ct. 1315, 63 L.Ed.2d 761 (1980). In giving an Allen charge, the trial court must avoid: (1) coercive deadlines, (2) threats of marathon deliberations, (3) pressure for the surrender of conscientiously held minority views, and (4) any implicat…
• Porter v. State, 439 So. 2d 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …of the Fifth Amendment would not have rendered them unavailable. We disagree. Whether or not the state met the unavailability of testimony test of Rule 3.191(f)(3), see generally, United States v. Dichne, 612 F. 2d 632 (2nd Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 928, 100 S.Ct. 1314, 63 L.Ed.2d 760 (1980), it satisfied Rule 3.191(f)(4) by showing a necessity for delay based upon developments which were not anticipated but which would materially affect the trial. Accordingly, we find no error in the trial court’s…
• Ratzlaf et ux. v. United States, 510 U.S. 135 (U.S. 1994)
  …tent to commit the crime’ ”), cert. denied, 484 U. S. 943 (1987); United States v. Eisenstein, 731 F. 2d 1540, 1543 (CA11 1984) (same); United States v. Dichne, 612 F. 2d 632, 636 (CA2 1979) (same standard under predecessor to § 5316), cert. denied, 445 U. S. 928 (1980); United States v. Schnaiderman, 568 F. 2d 1208, 1211 (CA5 1978) (same). The term “specific intent” does not, as the majority appears to assume, import the notion of knowledge of illegality. Rather, that term generally corresponds to the con…