LINCOLN AMERICAN CORP. ET AL.

v.

SUSMAN; AND EBERSTADT ET AL. V. FLAMM ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (31 total)

• Dennis v. Sparks, 449 U.S. 24 (U.S. 1980)
  …private persons who persuaded the immune judge to exercise his jurisdiction corruptly. Because the judgment below was inconsistent with the rulings of other Courts of Appeals3 and involves an important issue, we granted the petition for certiorari. 445 U. S. 942. We now affirm. Based on the doctrine expressed in Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335 (1872), this Court has consistently adhered to the rule that “judges defending against § 1983 actions enjoy absolute immunity from damages liability for acts perfor…
• United States v. Diggs, 649 F.2d 731 (9th Cir. 1981)
  …ust not be merely cumulative or impeaching; (4) must be material to the issues involved; and (5) must be such as, on a new trial, would probably produce an acquittal. See, e. g., United States v. Krasny, 607 F. 2d 840 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 942, 100 S.Ct. 1337, 63 L.Ed.2d 775 (1980); United States v. Cervantes, 542 F. 2d 773, [*740] 779 (9th Cir. 1976). The evidence offered by Oliverez fails to satisfy requirements (1), (2), and (5). When a defendant who has chosen not to testify subseque…
• Metlyn Realty Corp. & Kapflor Corp. v. Esmark, Inc., 763 F.2d 826 (7th Cir. 1985)
  …). Courts are quite shy about reopening judgments on account of perjury even in criminal cases. United States v. Krasny, 607 F. 2d 840, 843 (9th Cir.1979) (collecting other cases and criticizing language in a case from this circuit), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 942, 100 S.Ct. 1337, 63 L.Ed.2d 775 (1980). Because of the Eleventh Circuit’s characterization of the centrality of the testimony in Harre, it is not necessary to pursue the question whether this court would adopt all of the analysis of that case.…