TAYLOR

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• United States v. Baker, 693 F.2d 183 (D.C. Cir. 1982)
  …the forms, that defendant did not have authority to sell the checks and that the checks were government property, which they remain at least until delivery to the payees, United States v. Forcellati, 610 F. 2d 25, 30-32 (1st Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 944, 100 S.Ct. 1342, 63 L.Ed.2d 778 (1980). First, the undercover agent testified that defendant said that he had an associate working inside the government who had access to checks before they were mailed. S.R. at 56. Second, the undercover agent pur…
• United States v. Bailey, 734 F.2d 296 (7th Cir. 1984)
  …(D.Or.1980). Other courts have adopted the principle from the Collins case but have also provided no analysis for it. United States v. Evans, 572 F. 2d 455, 471 (5th Cir.1978); United States v. Forcellati, 610 F. 2d 25, 30 (1st Cir.1979), cert. den. 445 U.S. 944, 100 S.Ct. 1342, 63 L.Ed.2d 778 (1980); United States v. Farrell, 418 F.Supp. 308, 310 (M.D.Pa.1976); United States v. Edwards, 473 F.Supp. 81, 82 (D.Mass.1979); United States v. Gavin, 535 F.Supp. 1345, 1348 (W.D.Mich.1982). Thus, despite a raft of…
• United States v. LEE, 786 F.2d 951 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …n federal court. An appeal to the court of appeals is, therefore, proper under § 3731. See United States v. Forcellati, 610 F. 2d 25, 28 (1st Cir.1979) (appeal will lie from district court judgment affirming a magistrate’s conviction), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 944, 100 S.Ct. 1342, 63 L.Ed.2d 778 (1980); United States v. Moore, 586 F. 2d 1029, 1031-32 (4th Cir. 1978) (district court’s direction of acquittal following conviction by magistrate is reviewable). Title 28 U.S.C. § 1291 provides an alternative basis…