PORTER & DIETSCH, INC., ET AL.

v.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION; AND PAY'N SAVE CORP. V. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Citator

Cited By (55 total)

• Oscarson v. Orange Cnty., 725 So. 2d 404 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)
  …PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See § 90.605(1), Fla. Stat.; United States v. Fowler, 605 F. 2d 181, 185 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 950, 100 S.Ct. 1599, 63 L.Ed.2d 785 (1980); Spaulding v. Estate of Frey, 666 So. 2d 935, 936 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). COBB, HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur.…
• United States v. Russell, 703 F.2d 1243 (11th Cir. 1983)
  …amined in the context of the entire case, is so obvious that failure to notice it would seriously affect the fairness, integrity and public reputation of judicial proceedings. United States v. Fowler, 605 F. 2d 181, 184 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 950, 100 S.Ct. 1599, 63 L.Ed.2d 785 (1980). A close examination of the prosecutor’s closing argument reveals that Van Aernam’s contention lacks merit. A prosecutor may not impugn the credibility of witnesses by hinting at evidence outside the record, b…
• United States v. Gold, 743 F.2d 800 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …testimony below, they cannot succeed on this issue unless they can establish that the challenged remarks were so prejudicial that they constituted plain or fundamental error. United States v. Fowler, 605 F. 2d 181, 184 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 950, 100 S.Ct. 1599, 63 L.Ed.2d 785 (1980). The single statement by witness Kozuch at issue here, an isolated remark in a month-long trial, does not even approach this level of seriousness. If it was prejudicial to any of the defendants in this case,…