BRAY

v.

OKLAHOMA

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Wyche v. State, 906 So. 2d 1142 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)
  …y had no search or arrest warrant.” In making the statement that misrepresentation may be evidence of coercion, the panel in Turpin cited another decision from the Eighth Circuit,' United States v. Meier, 607 F. 2d 215 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 966, 100 S.Ct. 1658, 64 L.Ed.2d 243 (1980), and Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543, 88 S.Ct. 1788, 20 L.Ed.2d 797 (1968). As one would expect, there was no misrepresentation in Meier. Meier was convicted of failing to file income tax returns. An a…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Butera, 677 F.2d 1376 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …ir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1034, 102 S.Ct. 573, 70 L.Ed.2d 478 (1981); United States v. Leach, 613 F. 2d 1295, 1301-03 (5th Cir. 1980); United States v. Zicree, 605 F. 2d 1381, 1387 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied sub. nom. Kaufman v. United States, 445 U.S. 966, 100 S.Ct. 1656, 64 L.Ed.2d 242 (1980). The government has adequately shown that the indictment in this case charges acts in the same series. A motion for severance under Rule 14 is entrusted to the discretion of the district court, and a defendant…
• United States v. Washington, 782 F.2d 807 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …ashington argues that the diary was inadmissible because the court refused to review the entire diary in camera as required by the Jencks Act. 18 U.S.C. § 3500(c) (1982);19 see United States v. Jones, 612 F. 2d 453, 456 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 966, 100 S.Ct. 1656, 64 L.Ed.2d 242 (1980).20 In a forthright concession, the government admits that the district judge erred in failing to review the diary in camera and to excise irrelevant material himself. Brief of Appellee at 43. The remedy for th…