KONDRAT
v.
CITY OF WILLOUGHBY HILLS ET AL.; LAMERS DAIRY, INC., ET AL. V. SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE; PARKER V. TEXAS; SHUFFMAN, EXECUTRIX V. HARTFORD TEXTILE CORP. ET AL.; SHUFFMAN, EXECUTRIX V. HARTFORD TEXTILE CORP. ET AL.; CEFALU V. GLOBE NEWSPAPER CO.; SHUFFMAN, EXECUTRIX V. HARTFORD TEXTILE CORP. ET AL.; MORRIS V. CATE-MCLAURIN CO. ET AL.; JONES ET UX. V. GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP.; ALDERMAN V. BALKCOM, WARDEN; HAYES V. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; CLARK V. PAYNE ET AL.; BOWDEN V. ZANT, WARDEN; HARRISON V. NAIFEH, JUDGE, ET AL.; YOUNG V. INDIANA; HUNT V. GREENBERG, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALBANY COUNTY, ET AL.; TAYLOR V. CITY OF ATLANTA ET AL.; SELLARS V. COMMUNITY RELEASE BOARD OF CALIFORNIA
KONDRAT
CITY OF WILLOUGHBY HILLS ET AL.; LAMERS DAIRY, INC., ET AL. V. SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE; PARKER V. TEXAS; SHUFFMAN, EXECUTRIX V. HARTFORD TEXTILE CORP. ET AL.; SHUFFMAN, EXECUTRIX V. HARTFORD TEXTILE CORP. ET AL.; CEFALU V. GLOBE NEWSPAPER CO.; SHUFFMAN, EXECUTRIX V. HARTFORD TEXTILE CORP. ET AL.; MORRIS V. CATE-MCLAURIN CO. ET AL.; JONES ET UX. V. GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP.; ALDERMAN V. BALKCOM, WARDEN; HAYES V. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; CLARK V. PAYNE ET AL.; BOWDEN V. ZANT, WARDEN; HARRISON V. NAIFEH, JUDGE, ET AL.; YOUNG V. INDIANA; HUNT V. GREENBERG, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALBANY COUNTY, ET AL.; TAYLOR V. CITY OF ATLANTA ET AL.; SELLARS V. COMMUNITY RELEASE BOARD OF CALIFORNIA
445 U.S. 973
Supreme Court of the United States (1980)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Alderman v. Zant, 22 F.3d 1541 (11th Cir. 1994)…a subsequently denied Alderman a certificate of probable cause to appeal. The Supreme Court of the United States denied Alderman’s petition for a writ of certiorari. Alderman v. Balkcom, 444 U.S. 1103, 100 S.Ct. 1068, 62 L.Ed.2d 788, reh’g denied, 445 U.S. 973, 100 S.Ct. 1670, 64 L.Ed.2d 252 (1980). Alderman then filed an application for federal habeas corpus relief in federal district court. The district court ruled on two issues and granted relief as to the conviction and sentence. Alderman v. Austin…
-
In re Hartford Textile Corp. v. Hartford Textile Corp., 659 F.2d 299 (2d Cir. 1981)…49 (1980) (Docket No. 80-288; review sought with respect to 2 Cir. Docket No. 79-5060); cert. denied, 446 U.S. 909, 100 S.Ct. 1837, 64 L.Ed.2d 262 (1980) (Docket No. 79-1338); cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1080, 100 S.Ct. 1033, 62 L.Ed.2d 764, reh. denied, 445 U.S. 973, 100 S.Ct. 1670, 64 L.Ed.2d 251 (1980) (Docket No. 79-1001; review sought with respect to 2 Cir. Docket No. 79-5008); cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1078, 100 S.Ct. 1028, 62 L.Ed.2d 761, reh. denied, 445 U.S. 973, 100 S.Ct. 1669, 64 L.Ed.2d 251 (1980) (Dock…1 / 3
-
Bowden v. Francis, 733 F.2d 740 (11th Cir. 1984)…g an evidentiary hearing, denied Bow-den’s petition on January 10, 1979. The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed. Row- [*745] den v. Zant, 244 Ga. 260, 260 S.E. 2d 465 (1979) , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1103, 100 S.Ct. 1068, 62 L.Ed.2d 788, reh’g denied, 445 U.S. 973, 100 S.Ct. 1671, 64 L.Ed.2d 252 (1980). On August 13, 1980, Bowden again petitioned the Superior Court of Butts County for a writ of habeas corpus. The court considered the petition successive and summarily rejected it on September 4, 1980. The Supr…