WILLIAMS ET AL.
v.
BROWN ET AL.
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings in light of the decision of the Court announced today in City of Mobile v. Bolden, ante, p. 55.
It is so ordered.
Mr. Justice Blackmun,
concurring.
I, of course, must accept the Court’s vacation of the judgment and its remand. If, however, we were to reach the merits, then, in contrast to the result in City of Mobile v. Bolden, ante, p. 55, I would affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals in this case.
Mr. Justice White,
dissenting.
Because the decision below in this case is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law virtually identical to those in City of Mobile v. Bolden, ante, p. 55, I dissent for the reasons stated in my opinion in that case, ante, p. 94.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kirksey v. City OF Jackson, 714 F.2d 42 (5th Cir. 1983)…ed by discriminatory intent. 461 F.Supp. 1282 (S.D. Miss.1978). We vacated the district court’s judgment on appeal and remanded for reconsideration in light of the intervening decision of the Supreme Court in City of Mobile v. Bolden, 446 U.S. 55, 100 S.Ct. 1519, 64 L.Ed.2d 47 (1980). 625 F. 2d 21 (5th Cir.1980). On remand, following a supplemental hearing, the district court rejected plaintiffs’ demands and entered a judgment of dismissal. 506 F.Supp. 491 (S.D.Miss. 1981). We affirmed that decision. 663…
-
Kirksey v. City OF Jackson, 663 F.2d 659 (5th Cir. 1981)…ommission form of government. 461 F.Supp. 1282 (S.D.Miss. 1978). On appeal, we vacated the district court’s judgment and remanded for reconsideration in light of the intervening decision by the Supreme Court in City of Mobile v. Bolden, 446 U.S. 55, 100 S.Ct. 1519, 64 L.Ed.2d 47 (1980). 625 F. 2d 21 (5th Cir. 1980). On remand, following a supplemental hearing in which detailed evidence was presented by the parties, the district court rejected plaintiffs’ demands. 506 F.Supp. 491 (S.D.Miss.1981). We affirm. F…
-
Leila G. Brown v. Bd. OF Sch. Comm'rs OF Mobile Cnty., 706 F.2d 1103 (11th Cir. 1983)…s for the Fifth Circuit, which summarily affirmed the trial court’s decision.3 The Supreme Court vacated and remanded for further proceedings in light of City of Mobile v. Bolden, 446 U.S. 55, 100 S.Ct. 1490, 64 L.Ed.2d 47 (1980). Williams v. Brown, 446 U.S. 236, 100 S.Ct. 1519, 64 L.Ed.2d 181 (1980). The Fifth Circuit then remanded Brown to the district court for further proceedings. On remand to the district court, the United States intervened as a plaintiff. Another non-jury hearing was held before the d…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence