PENNSYLVANIA

v.

HENDERSON

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Johnson, 457 U.S. 537 (U.S. 1982)
  …her nonfinal cases. See Gonzalez v. New York, 446 U. S. 902 (1980); Brown v. Florida, 446 U. S. 902 (1980); Busch v. Florida, 446 U. S. 902 (1980); Vidal v. New York, 446 U. S. 903 (1980); Gordon v. New York, 446 U. S. 903 (1980); Gayle v. New York, 446 U. S. 905 (1980); and Dunagan v. Illinois, 446 U. S. 905 (1980). Alternatively, the Court could have given all these cases plenary review. Potential for unequal treatment is inherent in this process. As Justice Douglas “recalled,” when the Court decided Mira…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't of Labor v. Perini N. River Assocs., 459 U.S. 297 (U.S. 1983)
  …as assigned enforcement and administration responsibilities to the Director. We acknowledge that on three occasions, this Court has granted petitions for certiorari to review cases brought by the Director. See Director, OWCP v. Walter Tantzen, Inc., 446 U. S. 905 (1980), vacating and remanding Walter Tantzen, Inc. v. Shaughnessy, 601 F. 2d 670 (CA2 1979), revised on remand, 624 F. 2d 5 (1980); Director, OWCP v. Rasmussen, 436 U. S. 955 (1978); and Director, OWCP v. Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc., 433 U. S. 904…
• Alschuler v. Dep't OF Hous. & Urban Dev., 686 F.2d 472 (7th Cir. 1982)
  …al and economic integration in administering the section 8 program. 42 U.S.C. §§ 1437f(a), 3608(d)(5); see King v. Harris, 464 F.Supp. 827 (E.D.N.Y.), aff’d sub nom. without op. King v. Faymor Development Co., 614 F. 2d 1288 (2d Cir. 1979), vacated, 446 U.S. 905, 100 S.Ct. 1828, 64 L.Ed.2d 256, aff’d on remand without op., 636 F. 2d 1202 (2d Cir. 1980). HUD’s regulations substantially comply with this mandate: Proposed sites for substantial rehabilitation projects must be approved by HUD as meeting the fol…