GANT ET AL.

v.

UNION BANK ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• SRI Int'l v. Matsushita Elec. Corp. OF Am. & Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., Ltd., 775 F.2d 1107 (Fed. Cir. 1985)
  …jected calls for a “complexity exception”, stating that “we do not believe any case is so overwhelmingly complex that it is beyond the abilities of a jury.” In re U.S. Financial Securities Litigation, 609 F. 2d 411, 432 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 929, 100 S.Ct. 1866, 64 L.Ed.2d 281 (1980); see also Davis & Cox v. Summa Corp., 751 F. 2d 1507, 1516 (9th Cir.1985). The Seventh and Fifth Circuits have reserved judgment on the constitutionality of a complexity exception and have declined to apply it.…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Moore v. U.S. House OF Representatives, 733 F.2d 946 (D.C. Cir. 1984)
  …e." Burton v. United States, 196 U.S. 283, 25 S.Ct. 243, 49 L.Ed. 482 (1905); Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 297 [*955] U.S. 288, 56 S.Ct. 466, 80 L.Ed. 688 (1936) (Brandeis, J., concurring). . 628 F. 2d 133, 141 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 929, 100 S.Ct. 1867, 64 L.Ed.2d 282 (1980). . 360 F. 2d 505 (D.C.Cir. 1966). . 316 U.S. 491, 62 S.Ct. 1173, 86 L.Ed. 1620 (1942). See also Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66, 91 S.Ct. 764, 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971); 5 C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Amparo Cardenas v. Smith, 733 F.2d 909 (D.C. Cir. 1984)
  …lihood that the court could redress the injury.” The relief the plaintiff there requested could be obtained only by the consent of the British government. Id. at 261; see also Winpisinger v. Watson, 628 F. 2d 133, 139 n. 29 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 929, 100 S.Ct. 1867, 64 L.Ed.2d 282 (1980). Similarly, the relief in the present case could be obtained only through the consent of the Swiss government. Accordingly, Cardenas lacks standing as to her claims for injunctive and declaratory relief. Card…