HUETER

v.

LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF CENTRAL OHIO ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• Lottie Bruenn and Richard Switlik v. Great Adventure, Inc., 432 So. 2d 785 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …. The validity of the original judgment has been the subject matter of extensive appellate proceedings in the state courts of New Jersey, as well as review having been sought in the United States Supreme Court. Switlik v. Hard- [*786] wicke Corp., 446 U.S. 929, 100 S.Ct. 1866, 64 L.Ed.2d 281 (1980). It was also the subject matter of an original civil rights action in the Federal Courts. Switlik v. Hardwicke Company, Inc., 651 F. 2d 852 (3rd Cir.1981), cert. denied 454 U.S. 1064, 102 S.Ct. 614, 70 L.Ed.2…
• Zaldivar v. City OF LOS Angeles, 780 F.2d 823 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …e court may take judicial notice of any fact of which a district court could [*828] take judicial notice); Winpisinger v. Watson, 628 F. 2d 133, 138 n. 28 (D.C.Cir.) (court takes judicial notice of Senator Kennedy’s primary victories), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 929, 100 S.Ct. 1867, 64 L.Ed.2d 282 (1980). . This circuit has not declared the appropriate Rule 11 standards of review in a published opinion since the Rule was amended in 1983. We adopt the standard herein stated to maintain consistency with our law…
• Davis & COX v. Summa Corp., 751 F.2d 1507 (9th Cir. 1985)
  …nth Amendment right to jury trial in civil cases____ And we do not believe any case is so overwhelmingly complex that it is beyond the abilities of a jury.” In re U.S. Financial Securities Litigation, 609 F. 2d 411, 432 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 929, 100 S.Ct. 1866, 64 L.Ed.2d 281 (1980). Moreover, the district court’s error was not harmless. In civil cases, the harmless error standard applies to a court’s wrongful denial of a demand for a jury trial. See Atwood v. Pacific Maritime [*1517] Ass…