QUINONES ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Baez v. United States Dep't OF Just., 684 F.2d 999 (D.C. Cir. 1982)
  …ed in Lesar v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 636 F. 2d 472 (D.C.Cir. 1980) ($290); Weisberg v. CIA, No. 79-1729 (D.C.Cir. 30 June 1980) ($164); Hayden v. National Security Agency/Central Security Serv., 608 F. 2d 1381 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 937, 100 S.Ct. 2156, 64 L.Ed.2d 790 (1980) ($212). Attorneys’ fee awards, by contrast, may under some formulations exceed by a factor of five the amount actually in controversy in the suit. See, e.g., Copeland v. Marshall, 641 F. 2d 880 (D.C.Cir. 1980)…
• Wolfe v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 839 F.2d 768 (D.C. Cir. 1988)
  …s between agencies reveals so much about agency reasoning that it may not be mentioned in a Vaughn index justifying its withholding. The majority opinion’s reliance on Hayden v. National Security Agency, 608 F. 2d 1381 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 937, 100 S.Ct. 2156, 64 L.Ed.2d 790 (1980), highlights the danger of its disturbingly broad assertions in this respect. In Hayden, we found that public itemization and detailed justification for withholding information regarding the National Security Ag…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Paisley v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 712 F.2d 686 (D.C. Cir. 1983)
  …F. 2d 1187, 1214 (D.C.Cir.1978) (Wright, C.J., concurring). . If the Government’s affidavits fail to meet the standards of specificity set forth by this court, see Hayden v. Nat'l Security Agency, 608 F. 2d 1381, 1387 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 937, 100 S.Ct. 2156, 64 L.Ed.2d 790 (1980), then the District Court should consider in camera inspection of the documents. See Holy Spirit Ass’n for Unification of World Christianity v. CIA, supra note 36, 636 F. 2d at 845; Allen v. CIA, supra note 61,…