GRIFFIN

v.

MARYLAND

Citator

Cited By

• Mobil OIL Corp. v. The Dep't OF Energy & James B. Edwards, 728 F.2d 1477 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1983)
  …ipate in the rulemaking process and assure that an agency’s decisions will be informed and responsive. See, e.g., McCulloch Gas Processing Corp. v. DOE, supra, 650 F. 2d at 1221; Mobil Oil Corp. v. DOE, 610 F. 2d 796, 802 (TECA 1979) , cert. denied, 446 U.S. 937, 100 S.Ct. 2156, 64 L.Ed.2d 790 (1980); State of New Jersey v. EPA, 626 F. 2d 1038,1045 (D.C.Cir. 1980) . Accordingly, exceptions to § 553 will be “narrowly construed and only reluctantly countenanced.” Id.; accord S.Rep. No. 752, 79th Cong., 1st Se…
• Melvyn E. Stein v. Dep't OF Just. & Fed. Bureau OF Investigation, 662 F.2d 1245 (7th Cir. 1981)
  …by evidence of agency bad faith. Military Audit Project v. Casey, 656 F. 2d 724 (1981); Lesar v. Dep’t of Justice, 636 F. 2d 472 (D.C. Cir.1980); Hayden v. National Security Agency/Central Security Serv., 608 F. 2d 1381 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 937, 100 S.Ct. 2156, 64 L.Ed.2d 790 (1980); Terkel v. Kelly, 599 F. 2d 214. If this bur den is met, then summary judgment for the government is appropriate without an in camera review of the documents. The court has the authority to require the agency…
• Cnty. Fuel Co., Inc. v. United States Dep't OF Energy, 829 F.2d 44 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1987)
  …nt factors, whether there has been a clear error of judgment and whether there is a rational basis for the conclusions approved by the administrative body.” Mobil Oil v. Department of Energy, 610 F. 2d 796, 801 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.1979), cert, denied, 446 U.S. 937, 100 S.Ct. 2156, 64 L.Ed.2d 790 (1980) (Mobil I); Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Energy Administration, 531 F. 2d 1071, 1076-77 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.1976), cert, denied, 426 U.S. 941, 96 S.Ct. 2662, 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976); Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkans…