CHERRY

v.

NORTH CAROLINA

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Mills v. State, 476 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 1985)
  …found guilty of felony murder is more likely to receive a death sentence than a person found guilty of premeditated murder. See State v. Oliver, 302 N.C. 28, 274 S.E. 2d 183 (1981); State v. Cherry, 298 N.C. 86, 257 S.E. 2d 551 (1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 941, 100 S.Ct. 2165, 64 L.Ed.2d 796 (1980). This contention is without merit. The legislative determination that a first-degree murder that occurs in the course of another dangerous felony is an aggravated capital felony is reasonable. State v. Dixon, 2…
• United States v. Harrelson, 754 F.2d 1153 (5th Cir. 1985)
  …of Hearst in this respect is apparent — different considerations clearly apply to upholding the reasonable expectation of privacy in a public telephone booth and in a prison. See United States v. Paul, 614 F. 2d 115, 117-20 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 941,100 S.Ct. 2165, 64 L.Ed.2d 796 (1980) (Phillips, J., concurring). That Congress was aware of and sensitive to these considerations is demonstrated by the legislative history of the wiretapping statute: Paragraph (2) defines “oral communication” to…
• United States v. Kojo Sababu, 891 F.2d 1308 (7th Cir. 1989)
  …d that prison officials are “investigative or law enforcement officers” within the meaning of § 2510(7). United States v. Feekes, 879 F. 2d 1562, 1565 (7th Cir.1989); See also United States [*1329] v. Paul, 614 F. 2d 115, 117 (6th Cir.) cert. denied 446 U.S. 941, 100 S.Ct. 2165, 64 L.Ed.2d 796 (1980); United States v. Vasta, 649 F.Supp. 974, 989 (S.D.N.Y.1986); Crooker v. United States Dept. of Justice, 497 F.Supp. 500, 503 (D.Conn.1980). In Feekes, we found that the “ordinary course” exception was “clearly…