REBECCA COHEN, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ELSIE WEBER, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
v.
JOHNNY DENNIS AND FLORIDA TENT RENTALS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Administratrix of Elsie Weber's estate appealed a summary judgment granted to defendant Florida Tent Rentals, Inc. in a vehicle collision case. The court reversed, holding that even when a defendant has the right-of-way, summary judgment is inappropriate when material questions of fact remain regarding whether the defendant exercised reasonable care to avoid the collision.
Even when a party moving for summary judgment has the right-of-way, summary judgment is not automatic. The defendant must show there is no genuine issue of material fact; the right-of-way does not immunize a driver from the responsibility to use reasonable care and observe other vehicles. A jury question was presented, so summary judgment was erroneous.
“In an intersection accident even though the party moving for summary judgment had the right-of-way, he is not automatically entitled to a summary judgment. It is always the question for the jury to determine whether he should have observed the other vehicle and taken all proper actions and precautions to avoid the collision.”
Establishes the core holding that right-of-way does not guarantee summary judgment eligibility
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceElsie Weber, a passenger in a car, was struck at an intersection by a truck driven by Johnny Dennis and owned by Florida Tent Rentals, Inc. The front …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Duty Of Reasonable Care cases and more on FLexlaw
Elsie Weber joined by Nathan Weber, her husband, filed an action for damages against Johnny Dennis and Florida Tent Rentals, Inc. Johnny Dennis was never served and Elsie Weber and Nathan Weber have both died and the Administratrix of the Estate of Elsie Weber was substituted as party plaintiff.
Elsie Weber was a passenger in a car which was struck at an intersection by a truck driven by Johnny Dennis, now also deceased, which was owned by Florida Tent Rentals, Inc. At the intersection, the front part of the truck seems to have hit the right side of the car. No depositions of the drivers were taken as both were dead but depositions were taken of the passengers of the truck.
The trial court entered a summary judgment against the plaintiff and in favor of the defendant, Florida Tent Rentals, Inc. The plaintiff therefore filed this appeal.
In an intersection accident even though the party moving for summary judgment had the right-of-way, he is not automatically entitled to a summary judgment. It is always the question for the jury to determine whether he should have observed the other vehicle and taken all proper actions and precautions to avoid the collision. The fact that the driver has the right-of-way does not immunize or absolve him of the responsibility to use reasonable care. The moving party must show that there is no general issue of material facts and this he has failed to show. A jury question was presented and therefore it was error to grant a summary judgment for defendant. There is much difference between granting summary judgment and directing a verdict. A court may refuse to grant summary judgment and then direct a verdict on the trial of the cause. Harvey Building, Inc. v. Haley, Fla.1965, 175 So. 2d 780; Tompkins v. Rosenberg, Fla.App. 1967, 194 So.2d 688; Yost v. Miami Transit Company, Fla.1953, 66 So.2d 214; Weber v. Porco, Fla.1958, 100 So.2d 146; Visin-gardi v. Tirone, Fla.1967, 193 So.2d 601.
The plaintiff also alleged as error that the judge of the trial court assessed against the plaintiff the cost of a copy of deposition taken by plaintiff. The original was on file in the clerk’s office and could have been examined by the attorney for the defendant. Rule 1.400, Rules of Civil Procedure, 30 F.S.A., provides “Upon the filing of any deposition or affidavit taken under any rule or statute it shall be deemed published, unless otherwise ordered by the *467court, and may be opened and examined by any party in the presence of the clerk. * * * ” The Supreme Court of Florida in Florida Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Jones, Fla.1952, 60 So.2d 396, held that cost of copies is not properly assessable.
Therefore, the summary judgment and the cost judgment be and the same are hereby reversed and this cause is remanded for further proceedings.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Visingardi v. Tirone, 193 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 1966)
- Holland Paving Co., Inc. v. Dann, 175 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 1965)
- Harvey Bldg., Inc. v. Ocie M. Haley, 175 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 1965)
- Weber v. Porco, 100 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 1958)
- Florida Greyhound Lines v. Jones, 60 So. 2d 396 (Fla. 1952)
- Yost v. Miami Transit Co., 66 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 1953)
- Tompkins v. Montague Rosenberg, 194 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)