LEWIS S. RUDD, APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF FORT PIERCE, A FLORIDA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, V. M. CHRISTIANSON, R. E. WILSON ET AL., APPELLEES
LEWIS S. RUDD, APPELLANT,
CITY OF FORT PIERCE, A FLORIDA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, V. M. CHRISTIANSON, R. E. WILSON ET AL., APPELLEES
209 So. 2d 467
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
The appellant was an officer on the police force of the City of Fort Pierce. He contends that, under Rule VIII, Section 49 and Rule IX, Section 61 of the Fort Pierce Civil Service Personnel Rules and Regulations, he was entitled to permanent status as a Captain. The City disagrees and insists that Rule VIII, Section 54 governs. Reading, construing and comparing the sections 'in pari materia, we agree with the City’s position and the comprehensive and cogent opinion of the trial court which is the basis of this appeal.
Affirmed.
WALDEN, C. J., REED, J., and MUR-PHREE, JOHN A. H., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gator Shoe Corp. v. Taudte, 384 So. 2d 1344 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)…ions, the law is clear in this State, and we must follow it until changed, that the cost for copies of depositions is not a valid item to be included in a cost order. Florida Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Jones, 60 So. 2d 396 (Fla.1952); Cohen v. Dennis, 209 So. 2d 467 (Fla.3d DCA 1978). Therefore, the final judgment here under review is reversed as to the amount of attorney’s fees awarded and reversea as to the award of costs for copies of depositions. The matter is returned to the trial court for the purpose of…