ROSLYN S. GATEMAN, APPELLANT,

v.

DAVID H. GATEMAN, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Marion v. State, 287 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)
  …. Whitehead v. State, Fla.App.1973, 279 So. 2d 99; see, in particular, Williams v. State, Fla.1960, 117 So. 2d 473; Williams v. State, Fla.1962, 143 So. 2d 484. See also Bogan v. State, Fla.App.1969, 226 So. 2d 110; Winkfield v. State, Fla.App.1968, 209 So. 2d 468; Fivecoat v. State, Fla.App.1971, 244 So. 2d 188; Talley v. State, 1948, 160 Fla. 593, 36 So. 2d 201. It is fervently hoped that the prosecution will be mindful of the admonitions set forth in Davis v. State, supra; utmost care must be taken to ins…
• Owens v. State, 289 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974)
  …it the crime charged, Williams v. State, Fla., 110 So. 2d 654. However, in Christie v. State, Fla.App., 246 So. 2d 605, we said, “This 2nd District Court in Green v. State, Fla.App.1966, 190 So. 2d 42 (followed in Winkfield v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 209 So. 2d 468) endeavored to analyze Williams in the light of the many previous Florida cases on the point in question; and in the course of our opinion in Green we said * * * Evidence of other offenses which was admissible before Williams has been generally held…
• Farnell v. State, 214 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)
  …nd —its sole purpose is not to show the propensity of the accused to commit the instant crime charged; and —its admission is not precluded by some other specific exception or rule of exclusion.” And thereafter in Winkfield v. State, Fla.App.1968, 209 So. 2d 468, this Court, speaking through Judge Allen, requoted with approval the above language from Green. Applying the rationale of the above cases to the “similar fact” evidence adduced here, we are of the view that such evidence, covering alleged transact…

Authorities Cited

• O'Dell v. Carlton B. O'Dell, 204 So. 2d 734 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967)
• DuVERNOY v. DuVERNOY, 202 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967)