PAYTON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Baldacchino, 762 F.2d 170 (1st Cir. 1985)
  …the part of the defendant to the prosecuting attorney’s attention does not constitute a coercive promise sufficient to render any subsequent statements involuntary and inadmissible. United States v. Fera, 616 F. 2d 590, 594 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 969, 100 S.Ct. 2951, 64 L.Ed.2d 830 (1980). See also United States v. Curtis, 562 F. 2d 1153, 1154 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 910, 99 S.Ct. 279, 58 L.Ed.2d 256 (1978); United States v. Springer, 460 F. 2d 1344, 1347 (7th Cir.), cert. denied,…
• United States v. O'Grady, 742 F.2d 682 (2d Cir. 1984)
  ….Ct. 1112, 1116, 55 L.Ed.2d 349 (1978) (Congress was aware that “the conduct punishable under the Hobbs Act was already punishable under state robbery and extortion statutes”); United States v. LaBinia, 614 F. 2d 1207, 1209 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 969, 100 S.Ct. 2951, 64 L.Ed.2d 830 (1980) (“overlapping coverage” of Hobbs Act and later-enacted federal Bank Robbery Act does not preclude prosecution under the former); United States v. Cerilli, supra, United States v. Cerilli, supra, 603 F. 2d at 42…
• United States v. Kiendra, 663 F.2d 349 (1st Cir. 1981)
  …a motion to suppress a confession, finding that the defendant validly waived his right to remain silent. The ruling is to be upheld if any reasonable view of the evidence supports it, United States v. Payton, 615 F. 2d 922 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 969, 100 S.Ct. 2950, 64 L.Ed.2d 830 (1980), and any specific findings of fact made after a hearing are binding unless they are clearly erroneous. United States v. Jobin, 535 F. 2d 154 (1st Cir. 1976). In this case, the district court made several speci…