BOBBY JOE BASSHAM, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Urquhart v. State, 211 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)
  …e, use at trial the fact that he stood mute or claimed his privilege in the face of accusation. [Citations omitted.] ” See also Jones v. State, Fla.App.1967, 200 So. 2d 574. . For contrary holding see Shaw v. State, First District Court of Appeal, 209 So. 2d 477, Opinion filed April 18, 1968. . When asked why such a large number of officers was necessary to arrest one man, Inspector Salla testified that 16 or 17 years earlier the defendant had shot at an officer when the officer attempted to arrest him. Ho…
• Ridley v. State, 407 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)
  …that he not only stole the property but also committed the burglary which was necessary to accomplish the theft.1 See State v. Young, 217 So. 2d 567 (Fla.1968), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 853, 90 S.Ct. 112, 24 L.Ed.2d 101 (1969). See also Shaw v. State, 209 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968). The inference of guilt arises only when the accused’s possession of recently stolen property is personal and exclusive, Griffin v. State, 370 So. 2d 860 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), or from the defendant’s distinct and conscious asserti…
• Palmer v. State, 323 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)
  …10 So. 2d 238 (Fla.App.2d, 1968), cert. dism. Fla., 225 So. 2d 910 (Fla.1969); Urquhart v. State, 211 So. 2d 79 (Fla.App.2d, 1968); Carpenter v. State, 213 So. 2d 738 (Fla.App.2d, 1968), rev’d 222 [*617] So. 2d 194 (Fla.1969). Contra, Shaw v. State, 209 So. 2d 477 (Fla.App.1st, 1968), cert. dism. 218 So. 2d 168 (Fla.1968). The Supreme Court, over the dissent of three justices who wished to infer guilt from possession and to excise all reference to the accused’s explanation or the lack of it, sought in Young…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Piehl, 184 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 1966)