PETERSEN ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES; MITCHELL ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; CARLSON V. UNITED STATES; DIXON V. UNITED STATES; LEONHARDT V. UNITED STATES; IGO V. UNITED STATES; AND MILLER V. UNITED STATES
PETERSEN ET AL.
UNITED STATES; MITCHELL ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; CARLSON V. UNITED STATES; DIXON V. UNITED STATES; LEONHARDT V. UNITED STATES; IGO V. UNITED STATES; AND MILLER V. UNITED STATES
447 U.S. 905
Supreme Court of the United States (1980)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 97 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (97 total)
-
Murray Lash v. State, 399 So. 2d 534 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…asonable minded fact-finder could conclude that the representation was material, the court is obliged to conclude as a matter of law that the representation is immaterial. United States v. Ven-Fuel, Inc., 602 F. 2d 747 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905, 100 S.Ct. 2987, 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980); State v. Bingham, 51 Wash. 616, 99 P. 735 (1909); People v. Whiteman, 72 App.Div. 90, 76 N.Y.S. 211 (1902) (false representation with regard to defendant’s true name is immaterial where such falsity is not wha…
-
Ryiz v. The First Bankers, N.A., 516 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)…rights. The appropriate remedy for one who believes he has been wrongfully served with a Notice of Levy is to surrender the property and bring an action against the government. United States v. Weintraub, 613 F. 2d 612 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905, 100 S.Ct. 2987, 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980). The United States Tax Court, established by 26 U.S.C. § 7441, has jurisdiction over petitions for redetermination of liability for personal income taxes. In United States v. National Bank of Commerce, 472 U.S…
-
In re Japanese Elec. Prods. Antitrust Litig. (D.C. MDL No. 189). Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., Ltd., 723 F.2d 238 (3d Cir. 1983)…of coconspirator status), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 927, 98 S.Ct. 1494, 55 L.Ed.2d 521 (1977). The First, Second, and Tenth Circuits apply the preponderance standard. See United States v. Petersen, 611 F. 2d 1313, 1327 (10th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905, 100 S.Ct. 2986, 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980); United States v. Stanchich, 550 F. 2d 1294, 1297-99 (2d Cir.1977); United States v. Petroz [*262] ziello, 548 F. 2d 20, 23 (1st Cir. 1977). The Fourth Circuit is apparently equivocal. See United States v. St…
Previewing 3 of 97 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence