MACHINISTS NON-PARTISAN POLITICAL LEAGUE

v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Citator

Cited By

• Deerfield Med. Ctr. v. City OF Deerfield Beach, 661 F.2d 328 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …pecial circumstances’, [citations omitted] fees should be awarded.” Id. at 1149, quoting, New York Gaslight Club v. Carey, 449 U.S. 54, 100 S.Ct. 2024, 64 L.Ed.2d 723 (1980). This court then held that, in view of Mahoning Women’s Center v. Hunter, 447 U.S. 918, 100 S.Ct. 3006, 65 L.Ed.2d 1110 (1980), “the constitutionality of a city ordinance restricting first trimester facilities ... is not by itself a special circumstance justifying denial of a fee award.” 629 F. 2d at 1149.18 We can find no “special ci…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Ragsdale v. Turnock, 841 F.2d 1358 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …enforcement policies as to be unintelligible. In such circumstances, we simply “cannot untangle the constitutional from the unconstitutional provisions_” Mahoning Women’s Center v. Hunter, 610 F. 2d 456, 460 (6th Cir.1979), vacated on other grounds, 447 U.S. 918, 100 S.Ct. 3006, 65 L.Ed.2d 1110 (1980). As originally written, the statute and regulations represented at least a coherent, if unconstitutional, whole which regulated all aspects of abortion practice in Illinois. However, as a result of various ju…
• Planned Parenthood Ass'n OF Kan. City v. Ashcroft, 655 F.2d 848 (8th Cir. 1981)
  …rdinance on first trimester abortion facility); Word v. Poelker, 495 F. 2d 1349 (8th Cir. 1974) (ordinance regulating first trimester abortion clinics). See also Mahoning Women’s Center v. Hunter, 610 F. 2d 456 (6th Cir. 1979), vacated and remanded, 447 U.S. 918, 100 S.Ct. 3006, 65 L.Ed.2d 1110 (1980) (ordinance requiring expensive equipment and supervision by experienced obstetrician); Women’s Medical Center of Providence, Inc. v. Cannon, 463 F.Supp. 531 (D.R.I.1978) (requiring licensed physician with hosp…