TEXAS
v.
OKLAHOMA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Supreme Court appointed a Special Master to oversee proceedings in a dispute between Texas and Oklahoma, granting him authority to manage pleadings, conduct hearings, summon witnesses, and gather evidence, with costs to be divided among the parties as the Court would later determine.
© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
It is ordered that John A. Carver, Jr., Esquire, of Denver, Colo., be appointed Special Master in this case with authority to fix the time and conditions for the filing of additional pleadings and to direct subsequent proceedings, and with authority to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem necessary to call for. The Master is directed to submit such reports as he may deem appropriate.
The compensation of the Special Master, the allowances to him, the compensation paid to his technical, stenographic and clerical assistants, the cost of printing his report, and all other proper expenses shall be charged against and be borne by the parties in such proportion as the Court may hereafter direct.
It is further ordered that if the position of Special Master in this case becomes vacant during a recess of the Court, The Chief Justice shall have authority to make a new designation which shall have the same effect as if originally made by the Court. [For earlier order herein, see 444 U. S. 1065.]
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Halderman v. Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp., 673 F.2d 628 (3d Cir. 1982)…. Pennhurst State School & Hospital, 451 F.Supp. 233 (E.D.Pa.1978). . Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & Hospital, 612 F. 2d 84, 109, 111 (3d Cir. 1979). . Id. at 116 (footnote omitted). . 449 U.S. 980, 101 S.Ct. 393, 66 L.Ed.2d 242 (1980). . 448 U.S. 905, 100 S.Ct. 3046, 65 L.Ed.2d 1135 (1980). . See Memorandum of Judge Broderick, July 29, 1980, No. 78-1490, 42a-43a." . No. 78-1490, 39a. . Some defendants petitioned for a writ of mandamus which the Supreme Court on December 1, 1980 denied. In re…
-
Halderman v. Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp., 707 F.2d 702 (3d Cir. 1983)…0 S.Ct. 2984, 64 L.Ed.2d 853 (1980), and on June 30, 1980, pending its final disposition of the appeal, stayed our judgment to the extent that we mandated the movement of Pennhurst residents to CLAs, Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman, 448 U.S. 905, 100 S.Ct. 3046, 65 L.Ed.2d 1135 (1980) (interim order granting stay). The Court then reversed our decision, concluding that plaintiffs lacked standing under the applicable federal statute, and remanded the case for further consideration. Pennhurs…
Authorities Cited
- California v. Nevada, 444 U.S. 1065 (U.S. 1980)
- United States v. Alaska, 444 U.S. 1065 (U.S. 1980)