UNITED STATES

v.

MORRISON

Citator

Cited By (35 total)

• Sherman v. State, 419 So. 2d 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
  …s, 617 F. 2d 1063 (5th Cir. 1980), and those who venture on the seas are presumed to do so cognizant of the myriad number of regulations designed to promote their safe passage. United States v. Whitmire, 595 F. 2d 1303 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 448 U.S. 906, 100 S.Ct. 3048, 65 L.Ed.2d 1136 (1980). Customs officials have been granted broad statutory authority to board vessels and conduct inspections. See United States v. Freeman, 579 F. 2d 942 (5th Cir. 1978), and 19 U.S.C. § 1581(a). As a result, one’s…
• United States v. Morrison, 449 U.S. 361 (U.S. 1981)
  …tates’ petition for certiorari to consider whether this extraordinary relief was appropriate in the absence of some adverse consequence to the representation respondent [*364] received or to the fairness of the proceedings leading to her conviction. 448 U. S. 906. We reverse. The United States initially urges that absent some showing of prejudice, there could be no Sixth Amendment violation to be remedied. Because we agree with the United States, however, that the dismissal of the indictment was error in an…
• Institutionalized Juveniles in Pennsylvania institutions for the mentally ill and the mentally retarded v. Secretary OF Public Welfare, 758 F.2d 897 (3d Cir. 1985)
  …a plaintiff is a prevailing party to the extent extrajudicial relief makes legal claims moot. See Ross v. Horn, 598 F. 2d 1312, 1322 (3d Cir.1979) (plaintiffs were prevailing parties because changes in the law had mooted their claims), cert. denied, 448 U.S. 906, 100 S.Ct. 3048, 65 L.Ed.2d 1136 (1980); see also Doe v. Busbee, 684 F. 2d 1375, 1379 (11th Cir.1982) (“[A] party may be considered to be ‘prevailing’ if the litigation successfully terminates by a consent de [*912] cree, an out-of-court-settlement,…

  ← 1 / 2 →