A. H. ROBINS CO., INC., ET AL.

v.

ROSS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• United States v. McCLINTOCK, 748 F.2d 1278 (9th Cir. 1984)
  …1978, 76 L.Ed.2d 96, 104 (1983). It permits us “to supervise ‘the administration of criminal justice’ among the parties before the bar.” United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 735 n. 7, 100 S.Ct. 2439, 2446 n. 7, 65 L.Ed.2d 468 (1980), reh. denied, 448 U.S. 911, 101 S.Ct. 25, 65 L.Ed.2d 1172 (1980) (quoting McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332, 340, 63 S.Ct. 608, 613, 87 L.Ed. 819 (1943)). In deciding whether to invoke our supervisory powers to dismiss an indictment, we consider the egregiousness of the p…
• United States v. Fuesting, 845 F.2d 664 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …infringed”, and may not benefit from the protections afforded under the exclusionary rule. Rakas, 439 U.S. at 134, 99 S.Ct. at 427; see also United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 731-33, 100 S.Ct. 2439, 2444-45, 65 L.Ed.2d 468 (1980), reh’g denied, 448 U.S. 911, 101 S.Ct. 25, 65 L.Ed. 2d 1172 (1980); Alderman, 394 U.S. at 174, 89 S.Ct. at 966; United States v. Chase, 692 F. 2d 69, 70 (9th Cir.1982). B. Fuesting also challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence taken from his…
• Gibraltar Savings v. Ldbrinkman Corp., 860 F.2d 1275 (5th Cir. 1988)
  …ule 15 is procedural, and this question should be viewed solely as a matter of federal law. See, e.g. Seidman v. Fishburne-Hudgins Ed. Found., Inc., 724 F. 2d 413 (4th Cir.1984); Davis v. Piper Aircraft Corp., 615 F. 2d 606 (4th Cir.), cert. dism’d, 448 U.S. 911, 101 S.Ct. 25, 65 L.Ed.2d 1141 (1980); 3 J. Moore, Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 15.02[3] at 15-16 (2d ed. 1985). The filing of the third amended complaint thus defeats the usury argument since, as Gibraltar correctly contends, there is no comparable f…