DIOQUINO
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD ET AL; IRVIN V. NANNI ET AL.; HOP-WAH, AKA GREEN V. HOPPER, WARDEN; CROOKER V. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; DAVIS V. NEW YORK; MUINA V. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL LICENSING OF MONTANA ET AL.; BURGER V. GEORGIA; PROFIT V. CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, NEW YORK, ET AL.; YOUNG V. BALTIMORE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL.; JOHNSON V. CARTER, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES; FRANKLIN V. GEORGIA; CRISAFI V. WIETHE; WOODARD V. WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST CO. ET AL.; GINSBURG V. TIGHE; PROFFITT V. UNITED STATES; SMILEY V. CORCORAN, LOS ANGELES COUNTY CLERK, ET AL.; RUCKER V. CITY OF SAINT LOUIS ET AL.; WESTOVER V. UNITED STATES; DOBBS V. HOPPER, WARDEN
DIOQUINO
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD ET AL; IRVIN V. NANNI ET AL.; HOP-WAH, AKA GREEN V. HOPPER, WARDEN; CROOKER V. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; DAVIS V. NEW YORK; MUINA V. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL LICENSING OF MONTANA ET AL.; BURGER V. GEORGIA; PROFIT V. CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, NEW YORK, ET AL.; YOUNG V. BALTIMORE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL.; JOHNSON V. CARTER, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES; FRANKLIN V. GEORGIA; CRISAFI V. WIETHE; WOODARD V. WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST CO. ET AL.; GINSBURG V. TIGHE; PROFFITT V. UNITED STATES; SMILEY V. CORCORAN, LOS ANGELES COUNTY CLERK, ET AL.; RUCKER V. CITY OF SAINT LOUIS ET AL.; WESTOVER V. UNITED STATES; DOBBS V. HOPPER, WARDEN
448 U.S. 913
Supreme Court of the United States (1980)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Peek v. Kemp, 784 F.2d 1479 (11th Cir. 1986)…In making its determination, the jury is free to consider any mitigating evidence, see Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, 98 S.Ct. 2954, 57 L.Ed.2d 973 (1978); Franklin v. State, 245 Ga. 141, 263 S.E. 2d 666, cert. denied sub nom., Franklin v. Georgia, 448 U.S. 913, 101 S.Ct. 32, 65 L.Ed.2d 1176 (1980), and to interpret any evidence as mitigating in its decision to grant mercy. Spivey v. State, 241 Ga. 477, 246 S.E. 2d 288, cert. denied sub nom., Spivey v. Georgia, 439 U.S. 1039, 99 S.Ct. 642, 58 L.Ed.2d 699 (…
-
Burger v. Kemp, 753 F.2d 930 (11th Cir. 1985)…f this case. See Burger v. State, 242 Ga. 28, 247 S.E. 2d 834 (1978) (murder conviction affirmed, sentence vacated, case remanded for resentencing), Burger v. State, 245 Ga. 458, 265 S.E. 2d 796 (1980) (death sentence affirmed), cert. [*933] denied, 448 U.S. 913, 101 S.Ct. 31, 65 L.Ed.2d 1175 (1980), Blake v. Zant, 513 F.Supp. 772, 787-803 (S.D.Ga.1981) (writ denied as to conviction but granted as to death sentence), rev’d, Burger v. Zant, 718 F. 2d 979 (11th Cir.1983), rehr’g en banc denied, 726 F. 2d 755…
-
Burger v. Zant, 718 F.2d 979 (11th Cir. 1983)…28, 247 S.E. 2d 834 (1978). On remand, Burger was once again sentenced to death and the sentence was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Georgia. Burger v. State, 245 Ga. 458, 265 S.E. 2d 796 (1980). The United States Supreme Court denied certiorari. 448 U.S. 913, 101 S.Ct. 31, 65 L.Ed.2d 1175 (1980). After unsuccessfully exhausting available state post-conviction remedies, Burger filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal district court. The district judge granted the writ insofar as it vacate…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence