VINCENT

v.

TEXAS

U.S. | 1980-12-09

No. 79-5962

The Chief Justice and Justice Powell would dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

449 U.S. 199 Supreme Court of the United States (1980) Positive Treatment

Also reported at: 66 L. Ed. 2d 391 · 101 S. Ct. 632 · 1980 U.S. LEXIS 159 · SCDB 1980-014

Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.

The Chief Justice and Justice Powell would dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Coll v. State, 578 So. 2d 906 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)

…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. McCray v. State, 416 So. 2d 804 (Fla.1982); Antone v. State, 382 So. 2d 1205, 1214 (Fla.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 913, 101 S.Ct. 287, 66 L.Ed.2d 141, reh’g denied, 449 U.S. 1057, 101 S.Ct. 632, 66 L.Ed.2d 512 (1980); State v. Hassberger, 350 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1977); State v. Villar, 554 So. 2d 576 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); State v. Zamora, 534 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Herrera v. State, 532 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw