CATER

v.

ILLINOIS

Citator

Cited By

• Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Hyatt, 538 U.S. 488 (U.S. 2003)
  …t or significant aggregation of contacts, creating state interests, such that choice of its law is neither arbitrary nor fundamentally unfair [*495].’ ” Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts, 472 U. S. 797, 818 (1985) (quoting Allstate Ins. Co. v. Hague, 449 U. S. 802, 312-313 (1981) (plurality opinion)); see 472 U. S., at 822-823. Such contacts are manifest in this case: the plaintiff claims to have suffered injury in Nevada while a resident there; and it is undisputed that at least some of the conduct alleged t…
• Forest Hills Early Learning Ctr., Inc. v. Lukhard, 728 F.2d 230 (4th Cir. 1984)
  …specifically illustrative, the following recent cases involving state laws regulating the operation of child care and related services: Kansas v. Heart Ministries, Inc., 227 Kan. 244, 607 P. 2d 1102, (enforcement action by state), appeal dismissed, 449 U.S. 802, 101 S.Ct. 47, 66 L.Ed.2d 6 (1980); Tabernacle Baptist Church v. Conrad, C/A No. 79-149 (D.S.C. Oct. 27, 28, 1980) (unpublished) (action by free exercise claimants to enjoin enforcement). . Two different theories respecting the nature of the state’…