LOPEZ, GUARDIAN

v.

CITY OF DAYTON, OHIO, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Aguilar v. Felton, 473 U.S. 402 (U.S. 1985)
  …upp. 1248 (SDNY 1980) (PEARL), which involved an identical challenge to the Title I program. When the District Court in PEARL affirmed the constitutionality of the Title I program, ibid., and this Court dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction, 449 U. S. 808 (1980), the challenge of the present appellees was renewed. The District Court granted appellants’ motion for summary judgment based upon the evidentiary record developed in PEARL. [*408] A unanimous panel of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circ…
• Bailey v. Sharp, 782 F.2d 1366 (7th Cir. 1986)
  …eal. Rule 77(d) forbids the practice, and as a result people may lose the right of appeal without ever learning that there was a judgment they were entitled to appeal. See National Coalition for Public Education and Religious Liberty v. Hufstedler, 449 U.S. 808, 101 S.Ct. 55, 66 L.Ed.2d 11 (1980), dismissing for want of jurisdiction an appeal from 489 F.Supp. 1248 (S.D. N.Y.) (the dismissal does not state reasons, but the only one given in the papers before the Court was Rule 77(d)). See also Rodgers v. Wa…
• Betty-Louise Felton v. Sec'y, United States Dep't OF Educ., & the Chancellor of the Bd. of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 739 F.2d 48 (2d Cir. 1984)
  …f the New York City Board of Education to enjoin the program thus partially described as violative of the Establishment Clause. See National Coalition for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. Harris, 489 F.Supp. 1248 (S.D.N.Y.), appeal dismissed, 449 U.S. 808, 101 S.Ct. 65, 66 L.Ed.2d 11 (1980) [hereafter cited as “PEARL ”]. An evidentiary hearing was conducted before a three-judge court in May 1979. Pursuant to an agreement reached at a pretrial conference the defendants presented the bulk of their case…

  ← 1 / 2 →