AMERICAN TEXTILE MANUFACTURERS INSTITUTE, INC., ET AL.

v.

MARSHALL, SECRETARY OF LABOR, ET AL.; AND NATIONAL COTTON COUNCIL OF AMERICA V. MARSHALL, SECRETARY OF LABOR, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Hodel v. Va. Surface Mining & Reclamation Ass'n, Inc., 452 U.S. 264 (U.S. 1981)
• Am. Textile Mfrs. Inst., Inc. v. Donovan, 452 U.S. 490 (U.S. 1981)
  …bject to the constraints of economic and technological feasibility. The Court of Appeals held that the Act did not require OSHA to compare costs and benefits. AFL-CIO v. Marshall, 199 U. S. App. D. C. 54, 617 F. 2d 636 (1979). We granted certiorari, 449 U. S. 817 (1980), to resolve this important question, which was presented but not decided in last Term’s Industrial Union Dept. v. American Petroleum Institute, 448 U. S. 607 (1980),4 and to decide other issues related to the Cotton Dust Standard.5 I Byssin…
• W. & S. Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal., 451 U.S. 648 (U.S. 1981)
  …ding the retaliatory tax. 99 Cal. App. 3d 410, 159 Cal. Rptr. 539. The California Supreme Court denied Western & Southern’s petition for hearing. App. 89. Western & Southern filed a notice of appeal in this Court, and we noted probable jurisdiction. 449 U. S. 817 (1980). We affirm. II The Commerce Clause provides that “The Congress shall have Power ... To regulate Commerce . . . among the several States.” U. S. Const., Art. I, § 8, cl. 3. In terms, the Clause is a grant of authority to Congress, not an exp…