WEARLY ET AL.

v.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (23 total)

• Dep't OF Agric. & Consumer Servs. v. Polk, 568 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 1990)
  …ction when property is placed in jeopardy by governmental action can amount to an unconstitutional “taking” of property by destroying it or by exposing it to the risk of destruction.), vacated on other grounds, 616 F. 2d 662 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 822, 101 S.Ct. 81, 66 L.Ed.2d 25 (1980). Moreover, such inaction by the department could possibly cause irreparable damage to Florida’s citrus industry, a risk which the state simply cannot afford to take. In conclusion I would hold that the department…
• United States v. Gary L. "Scott" Dickey, 736 F.2d 571 (10th Cir. 1984)
  …Because we have also held that the evidence was sufficient to connect each appel [*590] lant to the single conspiracy, the “spillover effect” arguments are without merit. See United States v. Carter, 613 F. 2d 256, 260 (10th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 822, 101 S.Ct. 81, 66 L.Ed.2d 24 (1980); United States v. Hawkins, supra at 453. We must note here that when a trial court considers a motion for severance, it “must weigh the prejudice to a particular defendant caused by joinder against the obviously i…
• United States v. Severo D. Espinosa, 771 F.2d 1382 (10th Cir. 1985)
  …piracy charged, his argument that severance is required due to the overwhelming evidence against co-defendants is without merit. United States v. Dickey, 736 F. 2d at 589-90; United States v. Carter, 613 F. 2d 256, 260 (10th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 822, 101 S.Ct. 81, 66 L.Ed.2d 24 (1980). Separate trials are not required merely because severance might have offered the defendant a better chance for acquittal or have aided his attempt to cast blame on co-defendants. United States v. McClure, 734 F.…