UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA

v.

EVANSON ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (48 total)

• William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. ITT Cont'l Baking Co., Inc., 668 F.2d 1014 (9th Cir. 1981)
  …ce.” These requirements delimit “both the universe of ‘persons’ who are subject to the Act and the type of transactions that can constitute a violation thereof.” S & M Materials Co. v. Southern Stone Co., 612 F. 2d 198, 200 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 832, 101 S.Ct. 101, 66 L.Ed.2d 37 (1980). Only the third of these requirements is disputed in this case. We begin by noting that the jurisdictional reach of the Sherman Act is different from that of the Robinson-Patman Act. In enacting the Sherman Act…
• Stephens v. Dep't OF Health & Human Servs., 901 F.2d 1571 (11th Cir. 1990)
  …F. 2d 508, 511 (9th Cir.1984). The same argument applies to appellant’s request for mandamus, 28 U.S.C. § 1361. No right to mandamus exists where other adequate remedies are available. Jones v. Alexander, 609 F. 2d 778, 781 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 832, 101 S.Ct. 100, 66 L.Ed.2d 37 (1980). The CSRA provides other adequate remedies. Towers v. Horner, 791 F. 2d 1244, 1247 (5th Cir.1986). We conclude that the holding of Fausto is applicable to a preference-eligible federal employee, like Stephens, a…
• United States v. Gwaltney, 790 F.2d 1378 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …[C]ounsel are necessarily permitted a degree of latitude in the presentation of their closing summations.” United States v. Prantil, 764 F. 2d 548, 555 (9th Cir.1985), quoting United States v. Potter, 616 F. 2d 384, 392 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 832, 101 S.Ct. 101, 66 L.Ed.2d 37 (1980). While courts must allow the prosecution to strike “hard blows” based on the evidence presented and all reasonable inferences therefrom, they may not permit “foul blows.” Prantil, 764 F. 2d at 555. See also Unite…