SAN ANTONIO PORTLAND CEMENT CO.

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Wilson, 787 F.2d 375 (8th Cir. 1986)
  …sively in his favor concerning his whereabouts around the date of the robbery. The government is under no obligation to disclose to the defendant that which he already knows. See United States v. Young, 618 F. 2d 1281, 1287 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 844, 101 S.Ct. 126, 66 L.Ed.2d 52 (1980); United States v. Steffen, 641 F. 2d 591, 594 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 943, 101 S.Ct. 3091, 69 L.Ed.2d 959 (1981). Appellant’s mother-in-law likewise was available to him as a witness. E. Enriquez’s…
• United States v. Mabry, 809 F.2d 671 (10th Cir. 1987)
  …the court. United States v. Raineri, 670 F. 2d 702 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1035, 103 S.Ct. 446, 74 L.Ed.2d 601 (1982); United States v. Burns, 662 F. 2d 1378 (11th Cir.1981); United States v. Young, 618 F. 2d 1281 (8th Cir.) cert. denied, 449 U.S. 844, 101 S.Ct. 126, 66 L.Ed.2d 52 (1980). IY. The Mabry appellants argue that the “co-conspirator” evidence concerning statements made by Roger Sanders should have been excluded, since the trial court failed to determine that a conspiracy existed befo…