DANIELS

v.

OHIO

Citator

Cited By

• Hahn v. McLEY, 737 F.2d 771 (8th Cir. 1984)
  …is conceded that the theory of respondeat superior cannot be used under § 1983 to shift the responsibility for the plaintiff’s injuries to the supervisors of the actual wrongdoers. See Careaga v. James, 616 F. 2d 1062, 1063 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 851, 101 S.Ct. 140, 66 L.Ed.2d 62 (1980). However, a supervisor may be liable for the acts of a subordinate if injury is inflicted upon the plaintiff as a result of a breach of the supervisor’s duty to train, supervise, or control the actions of subord…
• United States v. DOE, 871 F.2d 1248 (5th Cir. 1989)
  …[italics in original] to file the motion for transfer was made by an authorized person, technical failure in filing is not fatal to jurisdiction.” United States v. Parker, 622 F. 2d 298, 307 (8th Cir.), cert. denied sub. nom. Ward v. United States, 449 U.S. 851, 101 S.Ct. 143, 66 L.Ed.2d 63 (1980). The logic of Parker applies to the instant case. The initial request to Mr. Lippe of the Department of Justice for authorization to proceed on the motion to transfer was submitted and signed by Ms. Eversberg her…
• United States v. Thunder, 714 F.2d 765 (8th Cir. 1983)
  …error. As an alternative basis for our holding, we would find reversible Bruton error even if the defendants’ pretrial statements in this case were “interlocking confessions.” In United States v. Parker, 622 F. 2d 298, 301 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 851, 101 S.Ct. 143, 66 L.Ed.2d 63 (1980), we adopted the harmless error analysis recognized in Justice Blackmun’s concurrence in Parker v. Randolph rather than the per se admissibility rule of the plurality. The harmless error rule protects more complet…